THE DATABRICKS DATABRICKS-GENERATIVE-AI-ENGINEER-ASSOCIATE WEB-BASED PRACTICE EXAM

The Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Web-Based Practice Exam

The Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Web-Based Practice Exam

Blog Article

Tags: Latest Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Mock Test, Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate High Quality, Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Dumps Free Download, Exam Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Training, Exam Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Study Solutions

Remember that this is a crucial part of your career, and you must keep pace with the changing time to achieve something substantial in terms of a certification or a degree. So do avail yourself of this chance to get help from our exceptional Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Dumps to grab the most competitive Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate certificate. Prep4away has formulated the Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate (Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate) product in three versions. You will find their specifications below to understand them better.

Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Exam Syllabus Topics:

TopicDetails
Topic 1
  • Application Development: In this topic, Generative AI Engineers learn about tools needed to extract data, Langchain
  • similar tools, and assessing responses to identify common issues. Moreover, the topic includes questions about adjusting an LLM's response, LLM guardrails, and the best LLM based on the attributes of the application.
Topic 2
  • Assembling and Deploying Applications: In this topic, Generative AI Engineers get knowledge about coding a chain using a pyfunc mode, coding a simple chain using langchain, and coding a simple chain according to requirements. Additionally, the topic focuses on basic elements needed to create a RAG application. Lastly, the topic addresses sub-topics about registering the model to Unity Catalog using MLflow.
Topic 3
  • Data Preparation: Generative AI Engineers covers a chunking strategy for a given document structure and model constraints. The topic also focuses on filter extraneous content in source documents. Lastly, Generative AI Engineers also learn about extracting document content from provided source data and format.

>> Latest Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Mock Test <<

Free Download Databricks Latest Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Mock Test Are Leading Materials & Valid Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate: Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate

To prepare successfully in a short time, you need a trusted platform of real and updated Databricks Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam dumps. Studying with updated Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate practice questions improve your skills of clearing the certification test in a short time. Prep4away makes it easy for you to prepare successfully for the Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Questions in a short time with Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Dumps. The product of Prep4away has been prepared under the expert supervision of thousands of experts worldwide.

Databricks Certified Generative AI Engineer Associate Sample Questions (Q56-Q61):

NEW QUESTION # 56
A Generative AI Engineer developed an LLM application using the provisioned throughput Foundation Model API. Now that the application is ready to be deployed, they realize their volume of requests are not sufficiently high enough to create their own provisioned throughput endpoint. They want to choose a strategy that ensures the best cost-effectiveness for their application.
What strategy should the Generative AI Engineer use?

  • A. Deploy the model using pay-per-token throughput as it comes with cost guarantees
  • B. Switch to using External Models instead
  • C. Throttle the incoming batch of requests manually to avoid rate limiting issues
  • D. Change to a model with a fewer number of parameters in order to reduce hardware constraint issues

Answer: A

Explanation:
* Problem Context: The engineer needs a cost-effective deployment strategy for an LLM application with relatively low request volume.
* Explanation of Options:
* Option A: Switching to external models may not provide the required control or integration necessary for specific application needs.
* Option B: Using a pay-per-token model is cost-effective, especially for applications with variable or low request volumes, as it aligns costs directly with usage.
* Option C: Changing to a model with fewer parameters could reduce costs, but might also impact the performance and capabilities of the application.
* Option D: Manually throttling requests is a less efficient and potentially error-prone strategy for managing costs.
OptionBis ideal, offering flexibility and cost control, aligning expenses directly with the application's usage patterns.


NEW QUESTION # 57
A Generative Al Engineer is developing a RAG application and would like to experiment with different embedding models to improve the application performance.
Which strategy for picking an embedding model should they choose?

  • A. Pick an embedding model trained on related domain knowledge
  • B. Pick the most recent and most performant open LLM released at the time
  • C. Pick an embedding model with multilingual support to support potential multilingual user questions
  • D. pick the embedding model ranked highest on the Massive Text Embedding Benchmark (MTEB) leaderboard hosted by HuggingFace

Answer: A

Explanation:
The task involves improving a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) application's performance by experimenting with embedding models. The choice of embedding model impacts retrieval accuracy,which is critical for RAG systems. Let's evaluate the options based on Databricks Generative AI Engineer best practices.
* Option A: Pick an embedding model trained on related domain knowledge
* Embedding models trained on domain-specific data (e.g., industry-specific corpora) produce vectors that better capture the semantics of the application's context, improving retrieval relevance. For RAG, this is a key strategy to enhance performance.
* Databricks Reference:"For optimal retrieval in RAG systems, select embedding models aligned with the domain of your data"("Building LLM Applications with Databricks," 2023).
* Option B: Pick the most recent and most performant open LLM released at the time
* LLMs are not embedding models; they generate text, not embeddings for retrieval. While recent LLMs may be performant for generation, this doesn't address the embedding step in RAG. This option misunderstands the component being selected.
* Databricks Reference: Embedding models and LLMs are distinct in RAG workflows:
"Embedding models convert text to vectors, while LLMs generate responses"("Generative AI Cookbook").
* Option C: Pick the embedding model ranked highest on the Massive Text Embedding Benchmark (MTEB) leaderboard hosted by HuggingFace
* The MTEB leaderboard ranks models across general tasks, but high overall performance doesn't guarantee suitability for a specific domain. A top-ranked model might excel in generic contexts but underperform on the engineer's unique data.
* Databricks Reference: General performance is less critical than domain fit:"Benchmark rankings provide a starting point, but domain-specific evaluation is recommended"("Databricks Generative AI Engineer Guide").
* Option D: Pick an embedding model with multilingual support to support potential multilingual user questions
* Multilingual support is useful only if the application explicitly requires it. Without evidence of multilingual needs, this adds complexity without guaranteed performance gains for the current use case.
* Databricks Reference:"Choose features like multilingual support based on application requirements"("Building LLM-Powered Applications").
Conclusion: Option A is the best strategy because it prioritizes domain relevance, directly improving retrieval accuracy in a RAG system-aligning with Databricks' emphasis on tailoring models to specific use cases.


NEW QUESTION # 58
A Generative Al Engineer is working with a retail company that wants to enhance its customer experience by automatically handling common customer inquiries. They are working on an LLM-powered Al solution that should improve response times while maintaining a personalized interaction. They want to define the appropriate input and LLM task to do this.
Which input/output pair will do this?

  • A. Input: Customer reviews: Output Classify review sentiment
  • B. Input: Customer service chat logs; Output: Find the answers to similar questions and respond with a summary
  • C. Input: Customer service chat logs; Output Group the chat logs by users, followed by summarizing each user's interactions, then respond
  • D. Input: Customer reviews; Output Group the reviews by users and aggregate per-user average rating, then respond

Answer: B

Explanation:
The task described in the question involves enhancing customer experience by automatically handling common customer inquiries using an LLM-powered AI solution. This requires the system to process input data (customer inquiries) and generate personalized, relevant responses efficiently. Let's evaluate the options step-by-step in the context of Databricks Generative AI Engineer principles, which emphasize leveraging LLMs for tasks like question answering, summarization, and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG).
* Option A: Input: Customer reviews; Output: Group the reviews by users and aggregate per-user average rating, then respond
* This option focuses on analyzing customer reviews to compute average ratings per user. While this might be useful for sentiment analysis or user profiling, it does not directly address the goal of handling common customer inquiries or improving response times for personalized interactions. Customer reviews are typically feedback data, not real-time inquiries requiring immediate responses.
* Databricks Reference: Databricks documentation on LLMs (e.g., "Building LLM Applications with Databricks") emphasizes that LLMs excel at tasks like question answering and conversational responses, not just aggregation or statistical analysis of reviews.
* Option B: Input: Customer service chat logs; Output: Group the chat logs by users, followed by summarizing each user's interactions, then respond
* This option uses chat logs as input, which aligns with customer service scenarios. However, the output-grouping by users and summarizing interactions-focuses on user-specific summaries rather than directly addressing inquiries. While summarization is an LLM capability, this approach lacks the specificity of finding answers to common questions, which is central to the problem.
* Databricks Reference: Per Databricks' "Generative AI Cookbook," LLMs can summarize text, but for customer service, the emphasis is on retrieval and response generation (e.g., RAG workflows) rather than user interaction summaries alone.
* Option C: Input: Customer service chat logs; Output: Find the answers to similar questions and respond with a summary
* This option uses chat logs (real customer inquiries) as input and tasks the LLM with identifying answers to similar questions, then providing a summarized response. This directly aligns with the goal of handling common inquiries efficiently while maintaining personalization (by referencing past interactions or similar cases). It leverages LLM capabilities like semantic search, retrieval, and response generation, which are core to Databricks' LLM workflows.
* Databricks Reference: From Databricks documentation ("Building LLM-Powered Applications," 2023), an exact extract states:"For customer support use cases, LLMs can be used to retrieve relevant answers from historical data like chat logs and generate concise, contextually appropriate responses."This matches Option C's approach of finding answers and summarizing them.
* Option D: Input: Customer reviews; Output: Classify review sentiment
* This option focuses on sentiment classification of reviews, which is a valid LLM task but unrelated to handling customer inquiries or improving response times in a conversational context.
It's more suited for feedback analysis than real-time customer service.
* Databricks Reference: Databricks' "Generative AI Engineer Guide" notes that sentiment analysis is a common LLM task, but it's not highlighted for real-time conversational applications like customer support.
Conclusion: Option C is the best fit because it uses relevant input (chat logs) and defines an LLM task (finding answers and summarizing) that meets the requirements of improving response times and maintaining personalized interaction. This aligns with Databricks' recommended practices for LLM-powered customer service solutions, such as retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) workflows.


NEW QUESTION # 59
A Generative Al Engineer has built an LLM-based system that will automatically translate user text between two languages. They now want to benchmark multiple LLM's on this task and pick the best one. They have an evaluation set with known high quality translation examples. They want to evaluate each LLM using the evaluation set with a performant metric.
Which metric should they choose for this evaluation?

  • A. RECALL metric
  • B. BLEU metric
  • C. ROUGE metric
  • D. NDCG metric

Answer: B

Explanation:
The task is to benchmark LLMs for text translation using an evaluation set with known high-quality examples, requiring a performant metric. Let's evaluate the options.
* Option A: ROUGE metric
* ROUGE (Recall-Oriented Understudy for Gisting Evaluation) measures overlap between generated and reference texts, primarily for summarization. It's less suited for translation, where precision and word order matter more.
* Databricks Reference:"ROUGE is commonly used for summarization, not translation evaluation"("Generative AI Cookbook," 2023).
* Option B: BLEU metric
* BLEU (Bilingual Evaluation Understudy) evaluates translation quality by comparing n-gram overlap with reference translations, accounting for precision and brevity. It's widely used, performant, and appropriate for this task.
* Databricks Reference:"BLEU is a standard metric for evaluating machine translation, balancing accuracy and efficiency"("Building LLM Applications with Databricks").
* Option C: NDCG metric
* NDCG (Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain) assesses ranking quality, not text generation.
It's irrelevant for translation evaluation.
* Databricks Reference:"NDCG is suited for ranking tasks, not generative output scoring" ("Databricks Generative AI Engineer Guide").
* Option D: RECALL metric
* Recall measures retrieved relevant items but doesn't evaluate translation quality (e.g., fluency, correctness). It's incomplete for this use case.
* Databricks Reference: No specific extract, but recall alone lacks the granularity of BLEU for text generation tasks.
Conclusion: Option B (BLEU) is the best metric for translation evaluation, offering a performant and standard approach, as endorsed by Databricks' guidance on generative tasks.


NEW QUESTION # 60
A Generative AI Engineer wants to build an LLM-based solution to help a restaurant improve its online customer experience with bookings by automatically handling common customer inquiries. The goal of the solution is to minimize escalations to human intervention and phone calls while maintaining a personalized interaction. To design the solution, the Generative AI Engineer needs to define the input data to the LLM and the task it should perform.
Which input/output pair will support their goal?

  • A. Input: Online chat logs; Output: Group the chat logs by users, followed by summarizing each user's interactions
  • B. Input: Customer reviews; Output: Classify review sentiment
  • C. Input: Online chat logs; Output: Cancellation options
  • D. Input: Online chat logs; Output: Buttons that represent choices for booking details

Answer: D

Explanation:
Context: The goal is to improve the online customer experience in a restaurant by handling common inquiries about bookings, minimizing escalations, and maintaining personalized interactions.
Explanation of Options:
* Option A: Grouping and summarizing chat logs by user could provide insights into customer interactions but does not directly address the task of handling booking inquiries or minimizing escalations.
* Option B: Using chat logs to generate interactive buttons for booking details directly supports the goal of facilitating online bookings, minimizing the need for human intervention by providing clear, interactive options for customers to self-serve.
* Option C: Classifying sentiment of customer reviews does not directly help with booking inquiries, although it might provide valuable feedback insights.
* Option D: Providing cancellation options is helpful but narrowly focuses on one aspect of the booking process and doesn't support the broader goal of handling common inquiries about bookings.
Option Bbest supports the goal of improving online interactions by using chat logs to generate actionable items for customers, helping them complete booking tasks efficiently and reducing the need for human intervention.


NEW QUESTION # 61
......

Our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate study materials provide free trial service for consumers. If you are interested in our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate study materials, and you can immediately download and experience our trial question bank for free. Through the trial you will have different learning experience on Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate exam guide , you will find that what we say is not a lie, and you will immediately fall in love with our products. As a key to the success of your life, the benefits that our Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate Study Materials can bring you are not measured by money. Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate test torrent can help you pass the exam in the shortest time.

Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate High Quality: https://www.prep4away.com/Databricks-certification/braindumps.Databricks-Generative-AI-Engineer-Associate.ete.file.html

Report this page